This article remains posted for it's historic context only -- some info herein is outdated.
Recently I wrote an article analyzing a private letter ruling (PLR 200251008), released at the end of last year (Using 1031 Funds to Build on Property You Already Own, Colorado Real Estate Journal, July 16, 2003). This decision allowed a taxpayer to use exchange proceeds from the sale of one property to build improvements on a piece of land that they already owned.
This ruling came as a shock to the exchange industry because it completely departed from a major 1951 tax court case (Bloomington Coca-Cola v. Commissioner) that disallowed such a scheme. Now, within a few months of the first ruling, the IRS has released a second ruling (PLR 200329021) that again allows a taxpayer to use exchange proceeds to build on their own land.
It Doesn’t End at 15%
1031 Reverse Exchanges: How exactly do they work
IRS Allows Exchange of Leasehold Interests in a 1031