Nationwide,
Toll-Free:
866-694-0204 |
articles
in the |
|
series...
|
|
| |
Other
People's Money - by
Peter C. Beller, in Forbes Magazine, 04.23.07
|
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
"Exchanger Beware..."
Intermediary's Commingled Account Destroys Clients'
1031 Exchanges -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real
Estate Journal, 02.18.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Another
1031 Intermediary Steals Client's Exchange
Money -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real Estate
Journal, 06.16.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Court
Puts Commingled 1031 Exchange Funds at
Risk -
by Gary Gorman, in The AZREIA Advantage,
09.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Yet
Another 1031 Intermediary Steals Client
Exchange Funds -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado
Real Estate Journal, 10.06.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
A
Sad New Tale of 1031 Intermediary Theft -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real Estate
Journal, 04.05.06 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
|
|
 |
Another
1031 Intermediary Steals Client's Exchange Money
Once
again, another 1031 intermediary
has stolen exchange proceeds. Several months
ago I wrote an article about a Minnesota intermediary
who lost his clients' exchange proceeds as a result
of day trading losses he incurred in a commingled
account for their exchanges (see 1031articles.com).
This time a California intermediary took the balance
of a commingled exchange account.
Remember,
one of the rules of entering into a Section 1031
tax-deferred exchange is that the IRS mandates that
you use a Qualified Intermediary (QI). Intermediaries
can hold client exchange accounts in one of two
ways: in a commingled account where
the combined proceeds of all client exchanges are
held in one single account. For example, if the
intermediary has 200 clients, all of their money
would be pooled into one bank account.
The alternative way is to hold the money in a separate
account for each client. So in this instance,
continuing my example from above, the intermediary
would have 200 separate accounts--one for each client.
In this new loss, the California intermediary, Linda
Ableman who ran CitiEscrow and
1031 Exchange, cleaned out the commingled
account she held for her exchange clients and tried
to disappear. Like the Minnesota intermediary who
suffered massive day trading losses, Ableman' s
theft was possible because of the commingled account.
Despite the massive amounts of money held by exchange
intermediaries, the intermediary industry is completely
unregulated. There is no test, or licensing, or
even background checks that are required of intermediaries
by either the Federal government or any of the 50
states.
|
|
 |
|
| |
| As
appeared in... |
|
 |
June
16, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
by
Gary Gorman
Founding Partner,
The 1031 Exchange Experts |
|
As
a practical matter, even a convicted felon can be a
qualified intermediary.
While
the vast majority of intermediaries are ethical individuals,
how do you protect yourself from the few who aren't?
The best way is to make sure your funds are held in
a separate account (called a "segregated"
account by the banking industry). When I say separate
I mean a separate account for just
your money.
Make sure when you interview a prospective intermediary
that they understand that you want your money in an
account all by its self. People have told us that the
intermediary assured them their money would be in a
separate account. Yet it wasn't -- and when confronted,
the intermediary claimed that when they said" ...it
would be held in a separate account," they meant that
their (commingled) account was "separate" from their
company' s operating checking account.
Obviously they are "spinning" their answer in an attempt
to disguise their commingled account. My mom called
this "lying." And don' t be misled by hollow assurances
of safety because they have a degree or have passed
some test. Just because they have initials after their
name, like "Esq." or "CPA" does not mean that your money
is magically safe in a commingled account. There are
crooks in every profession--you don' t have to be ethical
to pass a test. Even if the QI is ethical, what about
his employees?
So
why would a QI dare NOT segregate accounts? Basically,
because it' s more expensive and more time-consuming.
|
|
 |
|
It also requires the QI to have a very solid working
relationship with their banker or escrow agent.
It's
extra work, but obviously very worthwhile for the client'
s safety and security. My company, for example, holds
every client' s exchange funds in its own, separate
account as we always have because it' s the only real
way to protect the funds. Each of our accounts has the
client' s name on it (i.e., "The 1031 Exchange Experts,
LLC, as intermediary for Fred and Sue Jones"),
and the client' s tax identification
number, or social security number is the one used for
the account.
...when
confronted, the QI claimed his accounts
were "segregated" because they
were separate from the company's operating
account. |
|
In addition, to give our clients extra assurance that
once the money goes into their exchange account--and
that it stays there with no foul play--we developed
an internet product called 1031AccessTM.
We assign a "secret" portal on our web site to each
client for their exchange. This portal, via a specified
user-name and ID, allows them to view their money, in
their account at the bank, 24/7 via the internet. Their
portal is password-protected with a password
that they set themselves. In this way, our
clients can see what moneys have come into their account,
what's gone out, how much interest the account has earned,
and what their current interest rate is. Our clients
can view online, real-time their interest-bearing FDIC-insured
funds.
Like the judge in the Minnesota fraud case said, if
your exchange money is in a commingled
account, "Caveat Exchanger," or, Exchanger Beware!
|
|
|