Nationwide,
Toll-Free:
866-694-0204 |
articles
in the |
|
series...
|
| |
Other
People's Money - by
Peter C. Beller, in Forbes Magazine,
04.23.07 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
"Exchanger Beware..."
Intermediary's Commingled Account Destroys
Clients' 1031 Exchanges -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado
Real Estate Journal, 02.18.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Another
1031 Intermediary Steals Client's
Exchange Money -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real
Estate Journal, 06.16.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Court
Puts Commingled 1031 Exchange Funds
at Risk -
by Gary Gorman, in The AZREIA Advantage,
09.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Yet
Another 1031 Intermediary Steals
Client Exchange Funds -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado
Real Estate Journal, 10.06.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
A
Sad New Tale of 1031 Intermediary
Theft -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real
Estate Journal, 04.05.06 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
|
|
|
 |
A
group of 1031 investors
recently, and tragically, learned they had to pay
for a dishonest QI's indiscretion.
The IRS requires that a 1031 investor use an independent
third party called a Qualified Intermediary, or
"QI," to hold the investor's money during a 1031
exchange. Most QIs put all of their clients' sales
proceeds or exchange funds into one single account
– a "commingled" account. Very few intermediaries
set up separate, "segregated" accounts for each
client because it's more expensive and a time-consuming
process – and the QI must have a very good
working relationship with its bank and strong internal
controls. The failure to take this extra security
measure can have dire – even criminal –
consequences. Having everyone's exchange money in
a commingled account can destroy all the exchanges,
as the clients of one QI recently discovered.
 |
by
Gary Gorman
Founding Partner,
The 1031 Exchange Experts |
|
The
intermediary, Nation-Wide Exchange Services,
Inc. of St. Paul, Minnesota began day trading
with its clients' commingled exchange money. It
didn't take long before it lost a substantial amount.
Nation-Wide then used incoming
exchange funds from new investors to cover requests
from existing clients for funds to cover their replacement
purchases. This was essentially a Ponzi scheme of
sorts: one bad situation covering up an already
bad situation.
When the situation finally got to the point where
Nation-Wide couldn't cover its
exchange requirements, it filed bankruptcy. A court-appointed
trustee immediately decided that the single, commingled
exchange account was a bankruptcy asset,
meaning that the account was available for all creditors!
The trustee then concluded that because the account
was a bankruptcy asset, all money disbursed
from the account during the 90 days before the bankruptcy
had to be returned to the account. In other
words, those clients that received their funds during
that period for the purchase of their new property
had to return them to the trustee! Imagine being
told that the proceeds you used to buy your new
property has to be returned to the courts and handed
over to the creditors of the intermediary!
Some
clients resisted and a court case ensued. The bankruptcy
court ruled in favor of the trustee: the exchange
monies held by the intermediary were bankruptcy
assets available to general creditors because
the intermediary held the money in a commingled
account. The court also ruled that
because the monies were bankruptcy assets, all disbursements
from the account during the prior 90 days must be
returned to the account.
The
court's reason for ruling with the trustee was that
Nation-Wide used a commingled account.
It
ruled that "the lack of specific client instructions
to segregate proceeds, and the Debtor's (Intermediary's)
exercise of substantial control over the funds under
contractual warrant, mean that the funds became
the Debtor's property upon receipt..."
|
|
 |
|
| “Exchanger Beware...”
Intermediary's Commingled Account Destroys Clients'
1031 Exchanges |
| As
appeared in... |
 |
February
18 - March 2, 2004 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
| I
have passed some of your wonderful
articles on to others.
I know the importance of separate
accounts for each of the 1031 funds
-- a most important tidbit!
I am a former officer of a commercial
bank closed by the FDIC in the 70s.
Going through that particular bank
closing because of regulations regarding
"multiple accounts and joint/several
responsibility" really hit home.
It's disturbing to me that we still
have confusion about co-mingling funds
held for investors. Your profesional
presentation certainly speaks volumes
about your regard for your responsibilites
and ethics.
I
am certainly recommending you to anyone
in my sphere who might be a good candidate
for 1031, who may not be aware of
that tax advantages.Thank you so much!
I do appreciate your help and I will
certainly call you!
Mary
Sandoval
Realtor, Cherry Creek South
Centennial, Colorado |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The fact that the QI committed fraud (the principal
of the firm ultimately went to jail) against those clients
that were caught in this squeeze did not provide the
clients any defense against the trustee's
claims against their funds.
Nation-Wide
's exchange agreement (i.e., the contractual agreement
between it and its clients) provided that the monies
it held for each client had to be "Certificates of Deposit,
cash management, working capital, Money Market accounts,
Bankers Acceptances, or U.S. obligations in [the Debtor's]
discretion…" The exchange agreement also provided
that Nation-Wide was "not required
to maximize the return on these cash proceeds, security
and liquidity [were to] take precedence."
Clients
of The 1031 Exchange Experts can actually
view their account in real-time on the
internet using a new online service called 1031Access™
Visit
expert1031.com/
1031access for details.
|
|
On
the surface, the exchange agreement made it sound as
if Nation-Wide was focused on the security
of its client's money. That was, in fact, not the case.
And
that is the problem with commingled accounts –
you have no guarantees that the QI isn't mishandling
your money. This was a fatal mistake that the clients
made.
Each
client, or exchanger, was responsible for ensuring that
a segregated account was established by the intermediary
in order to protect their money, as made clear by the
court in its ruling when it said:
|
|
 |
| A
trusting exchanger [you, the client] might
assume that their sale proceeds would be segregated
in some way, and the assumption is not entirely
unreasonable. Unfortunately, under the Internal
Revenue Code and Internal Revenue Service regulations,
the incidents of this aspect of Qualified Intermediaries'
operation are unregulated. It literally is a matter
of ‘caveat exchanger' [exchanger beware!]."
|
What
the court is in effect saying is that if you allow the
QI to place your funds in a commingled account, what
happens to the money is your own fault.
The court is correct in
stating that the qualified intermediary industry is
unregulated. With the possible exception of Nevada,
which requires that each Intermediary post a bond with
the state, anyone can be an intermediary – even
a convicted felon.

What can you do about it? Be a wise and informed consumer!
For example, check with your realtor, CPA, or attorney
for referrals and references. Another thing you can
do is make sure the QI is bonded. Amazingly, only about
5% of Intermediaries carry a bond.
Most
importantly, insist that your escrow funds be held in
a segregated account. And even then,
check on the account from time-to-time to ensure that
the funds are still there (and still in a segregated
account) since there is nothing to prevent the QI from
moving the funds. Remember, Caveat Exchanger,
"...Exchanger Beware!!!"
|
|
|